Goldman Sachs Opened a $100B Fund to Crypto Firms Without Tokenizing

Goldman Sachs opened its $100 billion Treasury fund to crypto firms via Lynq, but chose traditional settlement over tokenization unlike BlackRock.

Jan Whitfield News

The Fund and the Network

Goldman Sachs opened its FTIXX Treasury fund to digital-asset companies through Lynq, a settlement platform running on a private Avalanche blockchain. The fund holds roughly $100 billion. It became available to crypto firms on September 28.

Lynq currently serves more than 30 institutional participants, including Wintermute, Galaxy, FalconX, Crypto.com, and Fireblocks. The platform holds over $89 million in assets. FTIXX is the second investment product listed there.

Access runs through tZERO Securities, an SEC-registered broker-dealer. Clients need relationships with tZERO and must clear onboarding checks. Only U.S. customers qualify.

What Goldman Did Not Do

The bank did not tokenize the fund. BlackRock and several others wrapped their Treasury products into blockchain-native tokens so investors could hold them on-chain. Goldman kept FTIXX within traditional custody and settlement frameworks.

This matters because tokenization has been sold as the future of finance for years. Goldman Sachs' approach suggests the pitch may not match what clients actually want. Crypto firms get yield on idle capital between trades without the regulatory uncertainty that comes with tokenized securities.

Lynq CEO Jerald David called it a convergence between traditional and digital asset participants. The convergence happened, but the assets stayed off-chain.

Goldman Sachs is wagering that crypto-native companies care more about access than innovation. They want a place to park cash that earns a return. Blockchain rails are fine for settlement, but the fund itself does not need to be reimagined as a token.

The alternative would have required new infrastructure, potentially slower regulatory approval, and forced clients to manage on-chain exposure for a product most view as boring collateral. Goldman Sachs chose the simpler path, unlike other firms that went the tokenization route.

The move also sidesteps the custody questions that come with tokenized assets. Who holds the underlying securities? What happens during a blockchain fork? How do you handle partial shares? Traditional fund infrastructure already has answers to those questions, tested through decades of regulatory oversight and court precedent.

Whether other banks follow depends on whether clients push back. If crypto firms start demanding tokenized exposure because it offers composability or transparency benefits Goldman's version does not provide, the strategy will age poorly. If they keep using it, the decision looks prescient.

The fund has been live for two days. That is not enough time to know which scenario plays out. But the choice has been made, and it runs in the opposite direction from what the tokenization advocates predicted Wall Street would do.

Disclaimer The information provided on Coinliva is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and involve risk. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, some details may change over time. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions.