Over 200,000 Smart Wallets Fell Idle. About $50M Is Still Inside.

DeFi Saver says over $50M sits forgotten in smart wallets across 10 plus lending protocols. More than 200,000 DSProxies are now unused.

Jan Kara Tech

DeFi Saver published a count on Wednesday that nobody had put a number on before. Spread across more than ten lending protocols, over $50 million in tokens is sitting inside smart wallets whose owners stopped opening them. Nothing was stolen here, and no bug locked the funds in place; the balances are simply parked in contracts that people opened years ago, used for a while, and then walked away from without emptying.

Alongside the post the team shipped a scanner called Token Saver. You give it an address or an ENS name, it checks the proxy contracts that address controls, and it returns whatever is still in them with a chain and a dollar value attached. One example in DeFi Saver's own write up shows a user holding roughly $1,579 in UNI he had no idea he still owned.

Most of these smart wallets went quiet in early 2024

DSProxy explains the bulk of it. MakerDAO built the contract, it has been running since 2018, and DeFi Saver used it as the default for years. The company's figure is blunt: more than 200,000 DSProxies have been created in total, and most are no longer in use. In early 2024 the default switched to Safe. A very large set of proxy contracts stopped receiving attention almost overnight, balances included.

Smart wallets are a different animal from the wallet in your browser extension. Each one is a contract that sits between your account and the protocol, and token approvals go to the contract rather than straight to Aave or Compound. That separation is the whole security argument for using one, and it is also the reason a leftover balance can end up somewhere the owner never thinks to look. If you have never checked which contracts hold your approvals, that is a related habit worth building through a proper approval audit. The Safe design that replaced DSProxy is the same multisig model covered in this guide to multisig wallets.

How the money got left behind

DeFi Saver names a handful of causes. Debt repayments overpaid because a frontend rounded the wrong way. Swaps that came back with more than the interface expected. Automation that closed a borrowed position and left the excess sitting where the transaction finished. Airdrops delivered to the proxy address instead of the account behind it.

None of it is dramatic. Each event strands a few hundred dollars, sometimes a few thousand, and the position that produced it is already closed so nobody goes back. Multiply that across six years of Maker, Aave, Compound and Instadapp activity and $50 million is what settles at the bottom. Recovering a balance takes one transaction. Anyone who has been through the harder version of this, where the keys themselves are gone, knows how much easier that is than reconstructing a lost wallet.

The size of it measured against Aave

Fifty million dollars sounds small next to DeFi's headline numbers. Set it against something real. DefiLlama data puts Aave V4 at $215.57 million in total value locked after four months on Ethereum mainnet, which makes the forgotten balances worth close to a quarter of everything the newest version of the largest lender holds. Income tells the same story from another direction. Aave booked $3.86 million in protocol revenue over the past thirty days, so the stranded pile is roughly thirteen months of what the protocol actually keeps, and Aave has already started pruning chains that earn it less.

Treat the $50 million as a floor. It is DeFi Saver's own count, drawn from the smart wallets its tooling can see, and other frontends built proxy systems that nobody has scanned. Recovery efforts in this corner of the market usually look nothing like this, closer to the scramble Resolv ran to claw back $80 million. Here the money is already yours and the only cost is the minute it takes to paste an address into a scanner.

Disclaimer The information provided on Coinliva is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and involve risk. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, some details may change over time. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions.
Jan Kara
Author

Jan Kara

Jan Kara is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Coinliva. His coverage focuses on the macro crypto landscape, including regulatory developments, institutional adoption, and structural shifts shaping the digital asset industry. He tracks how policy decisions, ETF flows, and corporate treasury moves connect to broader market dynamics, drawing on primary regulatory filings, official statements, and on-chain data.